Skip to Menu Skip to Content Skip to Footer

As an entrepreneur, with the head of the Soviet GAI Kazan "Station" shared (Case number 7)

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrint



Won a businessman at an auction house as a shop, only to build up began. Suddenly, police with guns in the guests arrived. It was announced that about this business have not heard anything, but in the building of a merchant will now be placed Soviet Traffic police

 

In May 2003, a private businessman Viktor I. Litvin born in 1958, was purchased at an auction of lease for premises located at: ul. Litvin proceeded to registration of all documents, including the conclusion of the lease. Entrepreneur Litvin going to open in the premises a shop selling automobile tires and accessories. Also, there should have been located office and warehouse space. After the act of sanitary and technical condition Lytvyn signed a contract with the contracting firm Stroytehnologiya-K, which the workers started to remove debris and restore destroyed the previous tenant partitions, walls, etc.
June 19, 2003 to that building in three cars pulled up officials of the Soviet police department, some of whom were armed with assault rifles. Senior among them was a leading person of traffic police of the Soviet police department city of Kazan L. He demanded the immediate cessation of all operations and vacate the premises, explaining it by the fact that this building will be located space traffic police. At the same time LA did not present any documents, entitling him to such actions. Police turn off all power tools and brought workers from the premises, then closed the door to his castle.
After some time the building drove Litvin VI, who demanded that the police explain their actions and showed him the documents. Two presented service certificates. They turned out to be a leading person 7 Battalion PPSM Soviet police department city of Kazan, S. and traffic police officer D. L. In this case presented, but did not show identification. Their actions, he explained that received an oral order from the head of Soviet District Administration to take this room. He also said Litvin, that he has no right to occupy this space, because he has no contract of sale or rental contract.
On this day, nor Litvin, nor his companions, nor working in the room were not admitted. The next day, June 20, 2003 was put round the clock police post with a radio station.
June 20, 2003 Litvin again tried to break into his room while he provided the video, which shows clearly that the premises are several police officers who anybody in the room is not allowed. The video recorded as L., said that "a representative of the state", thereby confirming that, doing all the above steps, he was with the performance of their duties. Next LA, using physical force, pushed Litvin from the premises. As a result of the use of physical force, Litvin was caused injuries: contusion of the soft tissue of the parietal region, bruised right knee, right shoulder bruise. This is confirmed by a medical certificate.
On the videotape provided Litvin recorded that the building is police post, and the building of approaching policemen in civilian clothes with guns that are banned from conducting further video.
All the facts described in this opinion, supported by explanations of the private entrepreneur Litvin and his companions Gainullina Dmitry Il'dusovich, Korotenkova Igor Aleksandrovich, video materials.

Based on the above, given that Lt. Col. L., and other police officers were committed actions clearly outside the scope of their official powers, which were aimed at taking the premises, ie to receive some material benefit for the employees of traffic police consider it necessary to make the case for Public Inquiry on illegal actions of police officers.
Just check out the material can be seen that neither Litvin, nor his companions did not allow any action that, in accordance with the Law "On militia" give rise to the use of physical force, which suggests that there was a violation of article. 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. L., as a representative of the state, intentionally subjected Litvin degrading treatment, pushing him. As a result, Litvin, hitting the metal door, was injured. Given this, I consider it necessary in the public inquiry to consider the violation of Art. 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Specialist investigations
Human Rights Centre of Kazan


Chronicle Antiproizvola

2003
August 7
Republic of Tatarstan Public Prosecutor's Office instituted criminal proceedings against two individuals in leadership positions in the police department of the Soviet district of Kazan on the fact of exceeding their official authority (Part 1 st.286 CCRF)
September 22.
Definition of the Arbitration Court of Tatarstan Litvin right to occupy the premises, was restored.
October 7
Prosecutor's Office of Soviet district of Kazan criminal case against the police stopped.

October 12
Public officials investigating the human rights center terminated at the request of the affected


These are the facts gathered in the course of its Human Rights Center of Kazan public investigation. All statements and explanations given to citizens voluntarily. Not all of these facts can be confirmed by state authorities. Employees of the Human Rights Centre of Kazan confident that the facts indicate misconduct of agents of the state. Human Rights Centre reserves the right to seek an effective official investigation on them, including international institutions.

We will provide more detailed information, facts and evidence in each case. To do this, write us a letter.


Reports - Деньги